| back to Reviews & essays |
ñòàòüÿ íà ðóññêîì Zagorod. The Suburbs of Petersburg, 2007«The Last Boy Scout»«The Art to Live In Art»Frank Williams belongs to that pretty common type of Americans who are especially stubborn: those “tough nuts” that look for adventures and put their lives on the line, which root and blossom in strange environments. The environment resists them as much as possible: the soil cracks with anger; the wind knocks them off their feet; not a drop falls from the sky but he still plants roots somewhere in Guatemala or, let’s say, Bangladesh. In several years he will be getting a friendly nod at the local pub, and soon he will be treated as a member of the community and pampered as a local star. Frank Williams settled in Moscow more than ten years ago during a pretty
rough time. He demonstrated special freeze resistance, recklessness and
a fighter’s spirit. He was scared neither by the devastation nor by the
immaterial playful flow of artistic life at that time, that is to say
no market for the arts, no institutions necessary for its normal existence.
Especially ill-considered was the partisan, secluded and self-contained
nature of the art scene. None of these prevailing problems impeded him:
he opened an atelier and jumped headlong into the artistic and communal
life. He started to create symbolic images advocating freedom and justice,
suggesting ways to make Russian life better in the traditional edificatory
and symbolic manner: “The Yolk”, “Crisis”, and “Prometheus”! He was just
like the Russian intelligentsia of 1960s that was “boiling up” in kitchens!
Today we see his vision as a positive one, but in those times his simple-hearted,
optimistic thinking, social activism, and especially his complete lack
of interest in artistic intrigues irritated many people. Fashionable galleries
and curators ignored him but he did not care. Dressed in neat working-overalls
just like a “blue collar” workman from middle-of-nowhere America, he forged,
cast and welded in his Moscow studio. His support came from curators of
provincial museums - modest people without strong ambitions who cared
more about the interests of museum-goers than their own place in the artistic
hierarchy. In the museums of Volga, Ural and Siberia regions where Williams
had his museum tour viewers welcomed the sculptor. Everything was clear:
the guy talked about life. “Crisis”: the broken cross-sleeper and a germinated
potato. “Escape from Sacrifice”? It was just like Vysotsky sang: “They
cornered me…” I remember that the audiences of the Russian Museum also
liked Williams right away. After his exhibition the sculpture “Next Stop”
stayed in the Russian Museum’s collection. The imagery of the piece, which
symbolized overcoming all possible inertias, was close to the Russian
avant-garde. After the exhibition tour it became clear to me why Williams
needs all these headaches and why he ultimately works in Russia: To receive
the naive and genuine reaction of the audience that has been long forgotten
in the West. The democratic idea of art, being an instrument of public
consciousness, is still strong in Russia. Maybe it is a slow response.
Maybe it is naivety. But it is strong. This factor is very appealing for
Williams, especially when keeping in mind the strongly structured and
stable art life within the American society. Contemporary American art
is pretty sterile and institutionalized. It does not give chance to talk
about pain and grief the way it’s done in the Russian tradition: emotionally,
“tearing a shirt off one’s chest” as they say. The contemporary Russian
art does not use this possibility either, but at least the tradition of
it still exists. Williams sensed the unspent narrative ness in the Russian
life. Art is hermetically sealed but life is open: streets scream; actors
fool; barge haulers (reference to Ilya Repin’s, “Barge Haulers of
the Volga”) pull their rope just like 100 years ago. By Alexander Borovsky: |